So here is what I think of Danielle and her definition.

First things first. There is very little, if any, fact backing up this definition. I want the actual laws that were passed to be listed and the reasons that the government gave for each. Then I want to know who benefitted (i.e. businesses, people, ect). Then I want to see opinions on both sides of the debate (i.e. those who agree with their reasons why and those who disagree and their reasons why). Without these, you have a lot of opinions that are very open to scrutiny and ridicule. I think that you will find through your search that there's more to it all than what we hear about on Fox or CNN. Much of the focus, as with previous works, is on those who complain too much. rather than the actual facts that concern airport security.

Content 6/40: I give the points because there was some passion involved, but most of the information in the definition is not backed by any fact and there are some very bold statements that are easily pumbled without fact backing them up.

Flow 18/20: I found it to be an easy read. It flowed well from one paragraph to another and wasn't long or boring.

Grammer and Spelling 18/20: Danielle always takes the time to check spelling and grammer. It's no surprise that this one is any different. Though she does lose some points for a couple of misspelled words.

Cover page 20/20: I think cover pages should be as simple as this one. Perhaps with more humor, but that doesn't come as naturally to some people as it does me and I can't hold that against anybody.

Total: 62/100

Not your best work, but with a little more work and a lot more information, you can make it better. Follow the advice and I'll reconsider the grade.